Sony claimed Microsoft’s “actual technique” behind its proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard is to make PlayStation “develop into like Nintendo” and never compete within the 18-rated shooter area.

The feedback had been made in a lately revealed response to the UK’s Competitors and Markets Authority’s choice to increase its investigation into the proposed acquisition.

In its 22-page response, Sony Interactive Leisure alleges that if the deal had been to undergo, customers would depart the PlayStation ecosystem, Microsoft may increase Xbox costs, and indie builders can be harmed by the fallout.

As has been the development with regulatory backwards and forwards, a lot of the doc focuses on Name of Responsibility and the perceived hurt Sony claims the Activision Blizzard deal would trigger, ought to the flagship franchise develop into unique to Xbox.

Honors Trailer | Name of Responsibility: Trendy Warfare 2

In a single part of its assertion, the platform holder factors to Microsoft’s feedback that different platforms have thrived with out Name of Responsibility, together with Nintendo Swap. In its closing response, Sony states that this declare “ignores the information”.

SIE argues that Nintendo’s technique is totally different from PlayStation and Xbox as a result of it does not depend on 18-rated shooter franchises – video games it says Microsoft may have unique digital possession of if the Activision deal is permitted by world regulators.

In that sense, he alleges that Microsoft’s “actual technique” with the Activision Blizzard deal is to make PlayStation like Nintendo, in that it does not compete in that area.

“Microsoft says Nintendo’s differentiated mannequin demonstrates that PlayStation does not want Name of Responsibility to compete successfully. But it surely does reveal Microsoft’s true technique,” the SIE assertion learn. “Microsoft needs PlayStation to develop into like Nintendo , in order that it could be a much less shut and fewer efficient competitor to the Xbox.

“After the transaction, Xbox would develop into the one-stop-shop for all console top-selling shooter franchises (Name of Responsibility, Halo, Gears of Warfare, +Doom, Overwatch), as the choice explains, and it could be then be free from any severe aggressive stress.

SIE’s assertion goes on to say that Activision’s video games, “particularly Name of Responsibility”, are “essential” to PlayStation.

“The franchise is firmly embedded within the psyche of players: each episode since Name of Responsibility’s launch in 2003 has constantly topped the charts,” he says, sharing redacted percentages from his viewership. he thinks he can be. lose to Xbox if CoD turns into unique.

“Ignoring these information, Microsoft argues that Nintendo succeeded with out entry to Name of Responsibility,” he continued. “That misses the purpose. The choice identifies a variety of proof exhibiting that Nintendo presents a differentiated expertise to Xbox and PlayStation because it focuses on household video games which are very totally different from PEGI 18 FPS video games like Name of Responsibility.

“That is corroborated by Microsoft’s inside paperwork, which the CMA says present that: ‘Basically, Microsoft’s inside paperwork comply with PlayStation extra carefully than Nintendo, with Nintendo usually lacking from any inside aggressive assessments.’

Whereas Activision’s deal has been cleared by regulators in Saudi Arabia and Brazil, the UK Competitors and Markets Authority lately prolonged its investigation right into a second section. He’s within the means of inviting members of the general public to share their views on the acquisition earlier than making his closing choice by March 1, 2023.

In its clarification of its choice to approve the acquisition, Brazil’s CADE mentioned it agreed with Microsoft’s assertion that PlayStation does not want Name of Responsibility to stay aggressive.

“As mentioned beforehand, Nintendo doesn’t presently depend on any Activision Blizzard content material to compete within the market,” he mentioned.